Ulin alongside Australian hardwoods
Ulin has a centuries-long record across South-East Asia, but is rarely specified in Australia. To help close that knowledge gap, we've put reclaimed Ulin alongside five of the most common decking timbers used here — metric by metric, with sources for every figure.
Just to be clear
Reclaimed timber carries no new-logging footprint and has already proven itself across decades of service. A century of wet/dry cycling is the hardest test the timber can pass.
“Time doesn’t weaken Ulin. It makes it stronger.”
Premium hardwood comparison
Denser wood packs more fibre into every cubic metre, which is why density quietly drives three things that matter for decking: hardness, natural decay resistance, and fire performance. A denser board absorbs impact without denting, has fewer voids for rot fungi to colonise, and ignites more slowly under radiant heat.
Janka measures the force needed to press an 11.28 mm steel ball halfway into a timber sample — a standardised proxy for how well a deck will hold up to dropped tools, dragged furniture, stiletto heels, and decades of foot traffic. Most residential flooring timbers sit between 4 and 9 kN; anything above 10 kN is premium decking territory, where differences become imperceptible underfoot.
Timber expands in wet weather and contracts in dry conditions — and it does so unevenly, shrinking roughly twice as much across the growth rings (tangentially) as through them (radially). Over years of wet/dry cycling, that differential movement opens surface checks, pulls boards into cup, and eventually produces splinter hazards underfoot. The timber doesn't fail — it remains structurally sound — but small splits and checks appear over time. On a deck those are a real consideration, not just an aesthetic one. Ulin's interlocked grain resists the movement by locking fibres in alternating directions; its low tangential shrinkage reduces the driving force in the first place. Combined with its exceptional natural durability, this makes reclaimed Ulin one of the longest-lasting outdoor timbers available anywhere in the world.
Classification tables
| Species | In-ground | Above-ground |
|---|---|---|
| Ulin reclaimed | Class 1 equiv. >25 yrs | Class 1 equiv. >40 yrs |
| Red Ironbark reclaimed | Class 1 >25 yrs | Class 1 >40 yrs |
| Merbau fresh | Class 1–2 typically Class 2 | Class 1 >40 yrs |
| Spotted Gum reclaimed | Class 2 15–25 yrs | Class 1 >40 yrs |
| Blackbutt reclaimed | Class 2 15–25 yrs | Class 1 >40 yrs |
| H3 Treated Pine fresh | Class 4 not suitable (H4/H5 required) | Class 4 H3 treatment only |
AS 5604 rates a timber's natural durability — the ability of its heartwood to resist decay fungi and insects without chemical treatment. Class 1 timbers carry extractive compounds (oils, tannins, silica) that are toxic to rot organisms and termites; Class 4 timbers have none and depend entirely on preservatives to reach any outdoor service life. The distinction matters because chemical envelopes fail over time, while natural durability doesn't.
| Species | BRT listed? | Max BAL (unsheathed) |
|---|---|---|
| Red Ironbark reclaimed | Yes | BAL-29 |
| Blackbutt reclaimed | Yes | BAL-29 |
| Spotted Gum reclaimed | Yes | BAL-29 |
| Merbau fresh | Yes | BAL-29 |
| Ulin reclaimed | Testing underway | BAL-12.5 (interim) |
| H3 Treated Pine fresh | Not listed | BAL-12.5 |
BAL (Bushfire Attack Level) measures the radiant heat, ember and flame exposure a building face may receive, in kilowatts per square metre. BAL-29 is the threshold at which unprotected timber decking becomes a compliance question: at 29 kW/m², unpiloted ignition of timber can occur from radiant heat alone. AS 3959 Appendix F lists seven species tested and approved as Bushfire-Resisting Timbers (BRT) for use at up to BAL-29 without additional protection: Blackbutt, Kwila (Merbau), Red Ironbark, River Red Gum, Silvertop Ash, Spotted Gum, and Turpentine.
| Species | Expected life | Termite resistance |
|---|---|---|
| Ulin reclaimed | 50+ yrs | Resistant — naturally, via dense heartwood extractives |
| Red Ironbark reclaimed | 40+ yrs | Resistant |
| Blackbutt reclaimed | 40+ yrs | Resistant |
| Spotted Gum reclaimed | 40+ yrs | Resistant |
| Merbau fresh | 25–40 yrs | Resistant — heartwood only; sapwood susceptible |
| H3 Treated Pine fresh | 15–25 yrs | Not natural — relies on H3 chemical envelope |
Termite resistance in Class 1 hardwoods comes from extractive compounds laid down in the heartwood while the tree was growing — tannins, oils and in Ulin's case also silica that make the timber indigestible or actively toxic to termites and decay fungi. These extractives don't wash out with rain or leach with age; a 50-year-old Ironbark bridge beam is as termite-resistant as the day it was milled. Treated softwoods, by contrast, rely on a chemical envelope — cut ends, deep checks or worn surfaces can expose untreated core.
| Species | Marine borers | Coastal / humidity |
|---|---|---|
| Ulin reclaimed | Exceptional — benchmark timber for jetties and marine piling | Excellent — high density resists salt intrusion |
| Red Ironbark reclaimed | Reasonably high (WoodSolutions) | Very good |
| Spotted Gum reclaimed | Moderate | Good — proven East Coast coastal decking |
| Blackbutt reclaimed | Low to moderate | Good — performs well in coastal NSW/QLD |
| Merbau fresh | Not marine-rated under AS 5604 | Moderate — tannin bleed severe in first 1–2 wet seasons |
| H3 Treated Pine fresh | Not suitable — H6 treatment required for marine | Fair — swells, checks and cups; avoid waterway runoff |
Marine-borer resistance is a separate property from land-based decay resistance — it describes how well heartwood holds up against shipworms (Teredo, Bankia) and gribbles (Sphaeroma) that attack submerged timber in salt and brackish water. It matters for any deck within 5 km of the surf coast (salt spray), any waterfront residence, and obviously anything over water. Most hardwoods have some resistance; very few are benchmark-grade.
How to read this comparison
Ulin and Red Ironbark are closely matched on the fundamentals — ~1,050–1,100 kg/m³ density, Class 1 durability, 40+ year lifespan, and comparable hardness underfoot.
Ulin pulls ahead on stability — lower shrinkage, fewer surface checks and splinter hazards over decades of wet/dry cycling.
Ulin is in a class of its own on wet-service — the benchmark timber across South-East Asia for jetties, piling and tidal zones. No Australian hardwood here approaches it.
Treated pine is budget decking; the hardwoods and Ulin are lifetime decking.
“Finite material. Generational lifespan. This is reclaimed Ulin.”
- Standards & government: AS 5604:2005 — Timber natural durability ratings (PDF); AS 3959:2018 Appendix F — Bushfire-Resisting Timbers summary; Bushfire performance of native Australian wood species (ScienceDirect); TPAA — AS 1604 Hazard Classes summary
- Ulin (Eusideroxylon zwageri): USDA Forest Products Laboratory — Wood Handbook; ITTO — Ulin species profile; Wood Database — Borneo Ironwood; IUCN Red List — Eusideroxylon zwageri (Vulnerable)
- Red Ironbark (Eucalyptus sideroxylon): WoodSolutions (FWPA) — Red Ironbark; Queensland Government — Narrow-leaved Red Ironbark
- Merbau (Intsia bijuga): WoodSolutions — Merbau; ITTO — Intsia bijuga profile; Austim — Merbau species data sheet (PDF)
- Radiata Pine (H3-treated): WoodSolutions — Radiata Pine; APVMA — Arsenic timber treatments chemical review; ABARES — Australia's Plantations data
- Supply & trajectory: Thor's Hammer — Recycled decking explained; NSW Government — Great Koala National Park (gazetted 7 Sept 2025); DAFF — Illegal Logging Prohibition Act
Values are species averages at 12% moisture content. Actual performance varies with growth region, log position, and processing. For structural or fire compliance, use project-specific test certificates and engineer sign-off.